DeBERTa fact-presence flags and low-BM25-score flags are only partly overlapping and jointly provide the strongest reported question-level association with QA failure, supporting the paper's interpretation that they capture complementary failure dimensions.

DeBERTa fact-presence flags and low-BM25-score flags are only partly overlapping and jointly provide the strongest reported question-level association with QA failure, supporting the paper's interpretation that they capture complementary failure dimensions. · CiteArk

测量结果

已评估 0/26 项

获得支持 0有争议或冲突 0尚未评估 26

保留同一结论下的完整结果组。已有评估排在前面；单项判断不替代整组结论。展开行查看条件、来源与历次证据。

每行是一项测量，分别显示论文报告、最近可用实测和累计证据状态。
指标与条件	论文报告	最近可用实测	证据判断
predictor: Random	-0.066 coefficient	—	尚未评估
predictor: Random	0.0011 probability	—	尚未评估
predictor: DeBERTa	-0.216 coefficient	—	尚未评估
predictor: DeBERTa	0 probability	—	尚未评估
predictor: BM25 threshold	-0.254 coefficient	—	尚未评估
predictor: BM25 threshold	0 probability	—	尚未评估
predictor: DeBERTa intersection BM25 threshold	-0.282 coefficient	—	尚未评估
predictor: DeBERTa intersection BM25 threshold	0 probability	—	尚未评估
	42.9%	—	尚未评估
flagCategory: Both flag	1,971 hops	—	尚未评估
flagCategory: Both flag	30.8%	—	尚未评估
flagCategory: DeBERTa only	1,230 hops	—	尚未评估

DeBERTa fact-presence flags and low-BM25-score flags are only partly overlapping and jointly provide the strongest reported question-level association with QA failure, supporting the paper's interpretation that they capture complementary failure dimensions.

报告指标与观测值

Assessment（0）

关联运行（0）

测量结果