The architecture ablation table reports that removing ContextNorm fails to converge, while additive fusion, auxiliary-loss budget control, and removing P-mask reduce the reported recall average relative to LoGo.

The architecture ablation table reports that removing ContextNorm fails to converge, while additive fusion, auxiliary-loss budget control, and removing P-mask reduce the reported recall average relative to LoGo. · CiteArk

测量结果

已评估 0/2 项

获得支持 0有争议或冲突 0尚未评估 2

保留同一结论下的完整结果组。已有评估排在前面；单项判断不替代整组结论。展开行查看条件、来源与历次证据。

每行是一项测量，分别显示论文报告、最近可用实测和累计证据状态。
指标与条件	论文报告	最近可用实测	证据判断
model_variant: LoGo · ablation_group: reference · reported_scope: single reported evaluation · parameter_scale: 1.5B	73.74 percentage_points	—	尚未评估
ablation: without progressive masking · model_variant: LoGo ablation · parameter_scale: 1.5B	71.59 percentage_points	—	尚未评估

The architecture ablation table reports that removing ContextNorm fails to converge, while additive fusion, auxiliary-loss budget control, and removing P-mask reduce the reported recall average relative to LoGo.

报告指标与观测值

Assessment（0）

关联运行（0）

测量结果