LoGo reports higher average needle-style RULER recall than the three comparison paradigms at both the 32k and 128k context-extension stages, with averages of 83.0 and 65.4 percentage points.

LoGo reports higher average needle-style RULER recall than the three comparison paradigms at both the 32k and 128k context-extension stages, with averages of 83.0 and 65.4 percentage points. · CiteArk

测量结果

已评估 0/2 项

获得支持 0有争议或冲突 0尚未评估 2

保留同一结论下的完整结果组。已有评估排在前面；单项判断不替代整组结论。展开行查看条件、来源与历次证据。

每行是一项测量，分别显示论文报告、最近可用实测和累计证据状态。
指标与条件	论文报告	最近可用实测	证据判断
input_lengths: ["8k","16k","32k"] · model_variant: LoGo · subtask_count: 8 · checkpoint_context: 32k	83 percentage_points	—	尚未评估
input_lengths: ["32k","64k"] · model_variant: LoGo · subtask_count: 8 · checkpoint_context: 128k	65.4 percentage_points	—	尚未评估

LoGo reports higher average needle-style RULER recall than the three comparison paradigms at both the 32k and 128k context-extension stages, with averages of 83.0 and 65.4 percentage points.

报告指标与观测值

Assessment（0）

关联运行（0）

测量结果