Across the same 40 papers, PaperDoctor generally produced more atomic findings per reviewer and paper than published referee reports or the Stanford Agentic Reviewer, with larger within-domain spread.

Across the same 40 papers, PaperDoctor generally produced more atomic findings per reviewer and paper than published referee reports or the Stanford Agentic Reviewer, with larger within-domain spread. · CiteArk

测量结果

已评估 0/16 项

获得支持 0有争议或冲突 0尚未评估 16

保留同一结论下的完整结果组。已有评估排在前面；单项判断不替代整组结论。展开行查看条件、来源与历次证据。

每行是一项测量，分别显示论文报告、最近可用实测和累计证据状态。
指标与条件	论文报告	最近可用实测	证据判断
source: Referee reports · paper group: Agents4Science	6.9 findings/reviewer/paper	—	尚未评估
source: Stanford Agentic Reviewer · paper group: Agents4Science	44 findings/reviewer/paper	—	尚未评估
source: PaperDoctor · paper group: Agents4Science	56.4 findings/reviewer/paper	—	尚未评估
source: Referee reports · paper group: ICML	6.7 findings/reviewer/paper	—	尚未评估
source: Stanford Agentic Reviewer · paper group: ICML	25.2 findings/reviewer/paper	—	尚未评估
source: PaperDoctor · paper group: ICML	47.9 findings/reviewer/paper	—	尚未评估
source: Referee reports · paper group: NatureScience	16.2 findings/reviewer/paper	—	尚未评估
source: Stanford Agentic Reviewer · paper group: NatureScience	37 findings/reviewer/paper	—	尚未评估
source: PaperDoctor · paper group: NatureScience	47.7 findings/reviewer/paper	—	尚未评估
source: Referee reports · paper group: SocialScience	17.5 findings/reviewer/paper	—	尚未评估
source: Stanford Agentic Reviewer · paper group: SocialScience	36.2 findings/reviewer/paper	—	尚未评估
source: PaperDoctor · paper group: SocialScience	36.1 findings/reviewer/paper	—	尚未评估

Across the same 40 papers, PaperDoctor generally produced more atomic findings per reviewer and paper than published referee reports or the Stanford Agentic Reviewer, with larger within-domain spread.

报告指标与观测值

Assessment（0）

关联运行（0）

测量结果