PaperDoctor attached both evidence and a suggestion to every finding by construction; referees did so for 35.9% of findings and the Stanford Agentic Reviewer for 1.5%, whose dominant pattern was suggestion without evidence.

PaperDoctor attached both evidence and a suggestion to every finding by construction; referees did so for 35.9% of findings and the Stanford Agentic Reviewer for 1.5%, whose dominant pattern was suggestion without evidence. · CiteArk

测量结果

已评估 0/16 项

获得支持 0有争议或冲突 0尚未评估 16

保留同一结论下的完整结果组。已有评估排在前面；单项判断不替代整组结论。展开行查看条件、来源与历次证据。

每行是一项测量，分别显示论文报告、最近可用实测和累计证据状态。
指标与条件	论文报告	最近可用实测	证据判断
source: Referee reports · pattern: Evidence + Suggestion	35.9 % of findings	—	尚未评估
source: Referee reports · pattern: Evidence only	9.3 % of findings	—	尚未评估
source: Referee reports · pattern: Suggestion only	35.8 % of findings	—	尚未评估
source: Referee reports · pattern: Neither	19 % of findings	—	尚未评估
source: Stanford Agentic Reviewer · pattern: Evidence + Suggestion	1.5 % of findings	—	尚未评估
source: Stanford Agentic Reviewer · pattern: Evidence only	0.7 % of findings	—	尚未评估
source: Stanford Agentic Reviewer · pattern: Suggestion only	69.9 % of findings	—	尚未评估
source: Stanford Agentic Reviewer · pattern: Neither	27.8 % of findings	—	尚未评估
source: PaperDoctor · pattern: Evidence + Suggestion	100 % of findings	—	尚未评估
source: PaperDoctor · pattern: Evidence only	0 % of findings	—	尚未评估
source: PaperDoctor · pattern: Suggestion only	0 % of findings	—	尚未评估
source: PaperDoctor · pattern: Neither	0 % of findings	—	尚未评估

PaperDoctor attached both evidence and a suggestion to every finding by construction; referees did so for 35.9% of findings and the Stanford Agentic Reviewer for 1.5%, whose dominant pattern was suggestion without evidence.

报告指标与观测值

Assessment（0）

关联运行（0）

测量结果