Among plans that ran, high-priority plans passed more often and errored less often than medium- or low-priority plans; medium-priority pass rates were close to low-priority rates rather than intermediate.

Among plans that ran, high-priority plans passed more often and errored less often than medium- or low-priority plans; medium-priority pass rates were close to low-priority rates rather than intermediate. · CiteArk

测量结果

已评估 0/12 项

获得支持 0有争议或冲突 0尚未评估 12

保留同一结论下的完整结果组。已有评估排在前面；单项判断不替代整组结论。展开行查看条件、来源与历次证据。

每行是一项测量，分别显示论文报告、最近可用实测和累计证据状态。
指标与条件	论文报告	最近可用实测	证据判断
outcome: Pass · priority: High	47.3%	—	尚未评估
outcome: Warning · priority: High	23.6%	—	尚未评估
outcome: Error · priority: High	29.1%	—	尚未评估
priority: High	110 plans	—	尚未评估
outcome: Pass · priority: Medium	33.3%	—	尚未评估
outcome: Warning · priority: Medium	32.1%	—	尚未评估
outcome: Error · priority: Medium	34.6%	—	尚未评估
priority: Medium	81 plans	—	尚未评估
outcome: Pass · priority: Low	33.6%	—	尚未评估
outcome: Warning · priority: Low	26.7%	—	尚未评估
outcome: Error · priority: Low	39.7%	—	尚未评估
priority: Low	116 plans	—	尚未评估

Among plans that ran, high-priority plans passed more often and errored less often than medium- or low-priority plans; medium-priority pass rates were close to low-priority rates rather than intermediate.

报告指标与观测值

Assessment（0）

关联运行（0）

测量结果