Reasons plans never ran differed by paper group: missing code dominated SocialScience, wet-lab procedures dominated NatureScience, and restricted data plus shared blockers dominated Agents4Science; overall, missing code or model weights was the largest blocker class.

Reasons plans never ran differed by paper group: missing code dominated SocialScience, wet-lab procedures dominated NatureScience, and restricted data plus shared blockers dominated Agents4Science; overall, missing code or model weights was the largest blocker class. · CiteArk

测量结果

已评估 0/30 项

获得支持 0有争议或冲突 0尚未评估 30

保留同一结论下的完整结果组。已有评估排在前面；单项判断不替代整组结论。展开行查看条件、来源与历次证据。

每行是一项测量，分别显示论文报告、最近可用实测和累计证据状态。
指标与条件	论文报告	最近可用实测	证据判断
	272 plans	—	尚未评估
reason: Incomplete runnable environment (missing code or model weights)	33.1 % of all plans that never ran	—	尚未评估
paper group: SocialScience	89 plans	—	尚未评估
reason: Missing code · paper group: SocialScience	65.2%	—	尚未评估
reason: Wet-lab · paper group: SocialScience	0%	—	尚未评估
reason: Restricted data · paper group: SocialScience	6.7%	—	尚未评估
reason: Same blocker as another · paper group: SocialScience	0%	—	尚未评估
reason: Resources · paper group: SocialScience	0%	—	尚未评估
reason: No reason given · paper group: SocialScience	28.1%	—	尚未评估
paper group: ICML	35 plans	—	尚未评估
reason: Missing code · paper group: ICML	37.1%	—	尚未评估
reason: Wet-lab · paper group: ICML	0%	—	尚未评估

Reasons plans never ran differed by paper group: missing code dominated SocialScience, wet-lab procedures dominated NatureScience, and restricted data plus shared blockers dominated Agents4Science; overall, missing code or model weights was the largest blocker class.

报告指标与观测值

Assessment（0）

关联运行（0）

测量结果