Agreement differed sharply by check: L2 claim-verification items were rejected less often than L1 surface-screening items; Experiment Review had the highest Evidence acceptance and Figure Review the lowest.

Agreement differed sharply by check: L2 claim-verification items were rejected less often than L1 surface-screening items; Experiment Review had the highest Evidence acceptance and Figure Review the lowest. · CiteArk

测量结果

已评估 0/66 项

获得支持 0有争议或冲突 0尚未评估 66

保留同一结论下的完整结果组。已有评估排在前面；单项判断不替代整组结论。展开行查看条件、来源与历次证据。

每行是一项测量，分别显示论文报告、最近可用实测和累计证据状态。
指标与条件	论文报告	最近可用实测	证据判断
axis: Evidence · scope: overall · verdict: accepted	71%	—	尚未评估
axis: Evidence · scope: overall · verdict: uncertain	11%	—	尚未评估
axis: Evidence · scope: overall · verdict: rejected	19%	—	尚未评估
axis: Suggestion · scope: overall · verdict: accepted	70%	—	尚未评估
axis: Suggestion · scope: overall · verdict: uncertain	11%	—	尚未评估
axis: Suggestion · scope: overall · verdict: rejected	18%	—	尚未评估
scope: overall	43.3 items/paper	—	尚未评估
axis: Evidence · scope: L1 paper-only screening · verdict: accepted	62%	—	尚未评估
axis: Evidence · scope: L1 paper-only screening · verdict: uncertain	12%	—	尚未评估
axis: Evidence · scope: L1 paper-only screening · verdict: rejected	27%	—	尚未评估
axis: Suggestion · scope: L1 paper-only screening · verdict: accepted	63%	—	尚未评估
axis: Suggestion · scope: L1 paper-only screening · verdict: uncertain	12%	—	尚未评估

Agreement differed sharply by check: L2 claim-verification items were rejected less often than L1 surface-screening items; Experiment Review had the highest Evidence acceptance and Figure Review the lowest.

报告指标与观测值

Assessment（0）

关联运行（0）

测量结果