The 24 optional written comments praised breadth most often but also criticized it most often; proposed fixes, novelty/framing silence, and false positives were the only aspects with more criticism than praise.

The 24 optional written comments praised breadth most often but also criticized it most often; proposed fixes, novelty/framing silence, and false positives were the only aspects with more criticism than praise. · CiteArk

测量结果

已评估 0/30 项

获得支持 0有争议或冲突 0尚未评估 30

保留同一结论下的完整结果组。已有评估排在前面；单项判断不替代整组结论。展开行查看条件、来源与历次证据。

每行是一项测量，分别显示论文报告、最近可用实测和累计证据状态。
指标与条件	论文报告	最近可用实测	证据判断
	24 comments	—	尚未评估
	79 responses	—	尚未评估
sentiment: praise	58 responses	—	尚未评估
sentiment: criticism	21 responses	—	尚未评估
aspect: Writing and language · sentiment: praise	9 responses	—	尚未评估
aspect: Writing and language · sentiment: criticism	2 responses	—	尚未评估
aspect: Presentation clarity · sentiment: praise	6 responses	—	尚未评估
aspect: Presentation clarity · sentiment: criticism	0 responses	—	尚未评估
aspect: Coverage of the review · sentiment: praise	10 responses	—	尚未评估
aspect: Coverage of the review · sentiment: criticism	5 responses	—	尚未评估
aspect: Cross-part consistency · sentiment: praise	5 responses	—	尚未评估
aspect: Cross-part consistency · sentiment: criticism	0 responses	—	尚未评估

The 24 optional written comments praised breadth most often but also criticized it most often; proposed fixes, novelty/framing silence, and false positives were the only aspects with more criticism than praise.

报告指标与观测值

Assessment（0）

关联运行（0）

测量结果