On the ambiguity-heavy AmbigNQ subset, CIGAsk 7B reports EM 0.511, substantially above the prompting and SFT baselines and the CIGAsk 3B variant; it also exceeds the contextual SGP and SGP-Oracle AmbigQA values placed in this column by the paper.

On the ambiguity-heavy AmbigNQ subset, CIGAsk 7B reports EM 0.511, substantially above the prompting and SFT baselines and the CIGAsk 3B variant; it also exceeds the contextual SGP and SGP-Oracle AmbigQA values placed in this column by the paper. · CiteArk

测量结果

已评估 0/9 项

获得支持 0有争议或冲突 0尚未评估 9

保留同一结论下的完整结果组。已有评估排在前面；单项判断不替代整组结论。展开行查看条件、来源与历次证据。

每行是一项测量，分别显示论文报告、最近可用实测和累计证据状态。
指标与条件	论文报告	最近可用实测	证据判断
method: Direct · dataset: AmbigNQ · backbone: Qwen2.5-7B	0.058 score (0-1)	—	尚未评估
method: FATA · dataset: AmbigNQ · backbone: Qwen2.5-7B	0.076 score (0-1)	—	尚未评估
method: ReAct · dataset: AmbigNQ · backbone: Qwen2.5-7B	0.076 score (0-1)	—	尚未评估
method: SFT · dataset: AmbigNQ · backbone: Qwen2.5-3B	0.056 score (0-1)	—	尚未评估
method: SFT · dataset: AmbigNQ · backbone: Qwen2.5-7B	0.109 score (0-1)	—	尚未评估
method: SGP · status: externally reported anchor · dataset: AmbigQA · backbone: Gemma-2-9B · protocol: 50/50 balanced dev	0.306 score (0-1)	—	尚未评估
method: SGP-Oracle · status: externally reported anchor · dataset: AmbigQA · backbone: Gemma-2-9B · protocol: 50/50 balanced dev · usesGoldAmbiguityLabels: true	0.359 score (0-1)	—	尚未评估
method: CIGAsk · dataset: AmbigNQ · backbone: Qwen2.5-3B	0.271 score (0-1)	—	尚未评估
method: CIGAsk · dataset: AmbigNQ · backbone: Qwen2.5-7B	0.511 score (0-1)	—	尚未评估

On the ambiguity-heavy AmbigNQ subset, CIGAsk 7B reports EM 0.511, substantially above the prompting and SFT baselines and the CIGAsk 3B variant; it also exceeds the contextual SGP and SGP-Oracle AmbigQA values placed in this column by the paper.

报告指标与观测值

Assessment（0）

关联运行（0）

测量结果