In a manual audit of eight ambiguous PACIFIC cases, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct returned an intent-consistent response in every case, whereas Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct did so in only one case; all three examples printed in Table 11 show the 7B reply matching the latent intent and the 3B reply contradicting it.

In a manual audit of eight ambiguous PACIFIC cases, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct returned an intent-consistent response in every case, whereas Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct did so in only one case; all three examples printed in Table 11 show the 7B reply matching the latent intent and the 3B reply contradicting it. · CiteArk

测量结果

已评估 0/2 项

获得支持 0有争议或冲突 0尚未评估 2

保留同一结论下的完整结果组。已有评估排在前面；单项判断不替代整组结论。展开行查看条件、来源与历次证据。

每行是一项测量，分别显示论文报告、最近可用实测和累计证据状态。
指标与条件	论文报告	最近可用实测	证据判断
simulator: Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct · auditedCases: 8	8 cases	—	尚未评估
simulator: Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct · auditedCases: 8	1 cases	—	尚未评估

In a manual audit of eight ambiguous PACIFIC cases, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct returned an intent-consistent response in every case, whereas Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct did so in only one case; all three examples printed in Table 11 show the 7B reply matching the latent intent and the 3B reply contradicting it.

报告指标与观测值

Assessment（0）

关联运行（0）

测量结果