Replacing GPT-4o with Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct as the fixed latent-intent-aware simulator leaves PACIFIC performance close to the main setting and slightly raises selectivity, whereas Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct substantially lowers post-clarification F1 and ambiguous-query recall.

Replacing GPT-4o with Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct as the fixed latent-intent-aware simulator leaves PACIFIC performance close to the main setting and slightly raises selectivity, whereas Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct substantially lowers post-clarification F1 and ambiguous-query recall. · CiteArk

测量结果

已评估 0/12 项

获得支持 0有争议或冲突 0尚未评估 12

保留同一结论下的完整结果组。已有评估排在前面；单项判断不替代整组结论。展开行查看条件、来源与历次证据。

每行是一项测量，分别显示论文报告、最近可用实测和累计证据状态。
指标与条件	论文报告	最近可用实测	证据判断
simulator: GPT-4o	0.795 score (0-1)	—	尚未评估
simulator: GPT-4o	0.768 score (0-1)	—	尚未评估
simulator: GPT-4o	0.873 proportion	—	尚未评估
simulator: GPT-4o	0.613 proportion-point difference	—	尚未评估
simulator: Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct	0.783 score (0-1)	—	尚未评估
simulator: Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct	0.752 score (0-1)	—	尚未评估
simulator: Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct	0.856 proportion	—	尚未评估
simulator: Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct	0.636 proportion-point difference	—	尚未评估
simulator: Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct	0.677 score (0-1)	—	尚未评估
simulator: Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct	0.536 score (0-1)	—	尚未评估
simulator: Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct	0.462 proportion	—	尚未评估
simulator: Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct	0.332 proportion-point difference	—	尚未评估

Replacing GPT-4o with Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct as the fixed latent-intent-aware simulator leaves PACIFIC performance close to the main setting and slightly raises selectivity, whereas Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct substantially lowers post-clarification F1 and ambiguous-query recall.

报告指标与观测值

Assessment（0）

关联运行（0）

测量结果