For CIGAsk 7B, both the mean CIG on clarification turns and the batch-weighted CIG rise over training; the paper reports that this rise coincides with the emergence of the ambiguous-recall versus clear-query false-positive-rate gap.

For CIGAsk 7B, both the mean CIG on clarification turns and the batch-weighted CIG rise over training; the paper reports that this rise coincides with the emergence of the ambiguous-recall versus clear-query false-positive-rate gap. · CiteArk

测量结果

已评估 0/4 项

获得支持 0有争议或冲突 0尚未评估 4

保留同一结论下的完整结果组。已有评估排在前面；单项判断不替代整组结论。展开行查看条件、来源与历次证据。

每行是一项测量，分别显示论文报告、最近可用实测和累计证据状态。
指标与条件	论文报告	最近可用实测	证据判断
series: IG on clarify turns · trainingStep: 5	0.17 CIG signal (nats)	—	尚未评估
series: IG on clarify turns · trainingStep: 250	0.47 CIG signal (nats)	—	尚未评估
series: IG batch-weighted · trainingStep: 5	0.02 CIG signal (nats)	—	尚未评估
series: IG batch-weighted · trainingStep: 250	0.23 CIG signal (nats)	—	尚未评估

For CIGAsk 7B, both the mean CIG on clarification turns and the batch-weighted CIG rise over training; the paper reports that this rise coincides with the emergence of the ambiguous-recall versus clear-query false-positive-rate gap.

报告指标与观测值

Assessment（0）

关联运行（0）

测量结果