Tool-level signatures over true, false, or omitted values for the four annotation fields were highly concentrated: 66 of 81 possible signatures occurred, the leading signature covered 39.9% of tools, no annotations was second at 26.0%, and the top three covered 75.8%.

Tool-level signatures over true, false, or omitted values for the four annotation fields were highly concentrated: 66 of 81 possible signatures occurred, the leading signature covered 39.9% of tools, no annotations was second at 26.0%, and the top three covered 75.8%. · CiteArk

测量结果

已评估 0/5 项

获得支持 0有争议或冲突 0尚未评估 5

保留同一结论下的完整结果组。已有评估排在前面；单项判断不替代整组结论。展开行查看条件、来源与历次证据。

每行是一项测量，分别显示论文报告、最近可用实测和累计证据状态。
论文报告	最近可用实测	证据判断
66 signatures	—	尚未评估
81 signatures	—	尚未评估
39.9 % of tools	—	尚未评估
26 % of tools	—	尚未评估
75.8 % of tools	—	尚未评估

Tool-level signatures over true, false, or omitted values for the four annotation fields were highly concentrated: 66 of 81 possible signatures occurred, the leading signature covered 39.9% of tools, no annotations was second at 26.0%, and the top three covered 75.8%.

报告指标与观测值

Assessment（0）

关联运行（0）

测量结果