Averaging the best setup of each method across the Appendix C tasks, the paper reports that tuned RSVD EGD has the largest average gains in both epochs and wall-clock time relative to vanilla SGD.

Averaging the best setup of each method across the Appendix C tasks, the paper reports that tuned RSVD EGD has the largest average gains in both epochs and wall-clock time relative to vanilla SGD. · CiteArk

测量结果

已评估 0/6 项

获得支持 0有争议或冲突 0尚未评估 6

保留同一结论下的完整结果组。已有评估排在前面；单项判断不替代整组结论。展开行查看条件、来源与历次证据。

每行是一项测量，分别显示论文报告、最近可用实测和累计证据状态。
指标与条件	论文报告	最近可用实测	证据判断
method: EGD (SVD)	44.8 fold	—	尚未评估
method: EGD (SVD)	9.8 fold	—	尚未评估
rank: best for each task · method: EGD (RSVD)	55.6 fold	—	尚未评估
rank: best for each task · method: EGD (RSVD)	14.7 fold	—	尚未评估
method: Column Normalization	16.9 fold	—	尚未评估
method: Column Normalization	13.2 fold	—	尚未评估

Averaging the best setup of each method across the Appendix C tasks, the paper reports that tuned RSVD EGD has the largest average gains in both epochs and wall-clock time relative to vanilla SGD.

报告指标与观测值

Assessment（0）

关联运行（0）

测量结果