On Adult classification, Fourier+LS trained fastest and had 14.9% test error. CVM had the lowest printed error, 14.8%, but required 73 minutes; Binning+LS had the highest printed error of the four entries.

On Adult classification, Fourier+LS trained fastest and had 14.9% test error. CVM had the lowest printed error, 14.8%, but required 73 minutes; Binning+LS had the highest printed error of the four entries. · CiteArk

测量结果

已评估 0/8 项

获得支持 0有争议或冲突 0尚未评估 8

保留同一结论下的完整结果组。已有评估排在前面；单项判断不替代整组结论。展开行查看条件、来源与历次证据。

每行是一项测量，分别显示论文报告、最近可用实测和累计证据状态。
论文报告	最近可用实测	证据判断
14.9%	—	尚未评估
9 seconds	—	尚未评估
15.3%	—	尚未评估
1.5 minutes	—	尚未评估
14.8%	—	尚未评估
73 minutes	—	尚未评估
15.1%	—	尚未评估
7 minutes	—	尚未评估

On Adult classification, Fourier+LS trained fastest and had 14.9% test error. CVM had the lowest printed error, 14.8%, but required 73 minutes; Binning+LS had the highest printed error of the four entries.

报告指标与观测值

Assessment（0）

关联运行（0）

测量结果