On Reddit, SGC reports 94.9% test micro-F1, above supervised SAGE-GCN and FastGCN by more than one point and above both trained and randomly initialized DGI, while below GaAN and two supervised GraphSAGE variants. · CiteArk

On Reddit, SGC reports 94.9% test micro-F1, above supervised SAGE-GCN and FastGCN by more than one point and above both trained and randomly initialized DGI, while below GaAN and two supervised GraphSAGE variants. · CiteArk

测量结果

已评估 0/11 项

获得支持 0有争议或冲突 0尚未评估 11

保留同一结论下的完整结果组。已有评估排在前面；单项判断不替代整组结论。展开行查看条件、来源与历次证据。

每行是一项测量，分别显示论文报告、最近可用实测和累计证据状态。
指标与条件	论文报告	最近可用实测	证据判断
	96.4%	—	尚未评估
	95%	—	尚未评估
	95.4%	—	尚未评估
	93%	—	尚未评估
	93.7%	—	尚未评估
	89.7%	—	尚未评估
	90.7%	—	尚未评估
	90.8%	—	尚未评估
	94%	—	尚未评估
	93.3%	—	尚未评估
	94.9%	—	尚未评估