Across Cora, Citeseer, and Pubmed, SGC has the lowest reported mean training time among the models in Table 8; Figure 3 labels Pubmed competitors as 6× to 909× SGC's relative training time while SGC retains competitive accuracy.

Across Cora, Citeseer, and Pubmed, SGC has the lowest reported mean training time among the models in Table 8; Figure 3 labels Pubmed competitors as 6× to 909× SGC's relative training time while SGC retains competitive accuracy. · CiteArk

测量结果

已评估 0/32 项

获得支持 0有争议或冲突 0尚未评估 32

保留同一结论下的完整结果组。已有评估排在前面；单项判断不替代整组结论。展开行查看条件、来源与历次证据。

每行是一项测量，分别显示论文报告、最近可用实测和累计证据状态。
论文报告	最近可用实测	证据判断
0.49 seconds	—	尚未评估
63.1 seconds	—	尚未评估
2.47 seconds	—	尚未评估
2.09 seconds	—	尚未评估
15.02 seconds	—	尚未评估
10.15 seconds	—	尚未评估
21.24 seconds	—	尚未评估
0.13 seconds	—	尚未评估
0.59 seconds	—	尚未评估
118.1 seconds	—	尚未评估
3.96 seconds	—	尚未评估
4.47 seconds	—	尚未评估

Across Cora, Citeseer, and Pubmed, SGC has the lowest reported mean training time among the models in Table 8; Figure 3 labels Pubmed competitors as 6× to 909× SGC's relative training time while SGC retains competitive accuracy.

报告指标与观测值

Assessment（0）

关联运行（0）

测量结果