K=2 SGC matches or slightly exceeds TextGCN accuracy on 20NG, R8, R52, and Ohsumed while training much faster; on MR it is 0.4 percentage points lower, though still faster. The largest reported speedup is 83.6×.

K=2 SGC matches or slightly exceeds TextGCN accuracy on 20NG, R8, R52, and Ohsumed while training much faster; on MR it is 0.4 percentage points lower, though still faster. The largest reported speedup is 83.6×. · CiteArk

测量结果

已评估 0/21 项

获得支持 0有争议或冲突 0尚未评估 21

保留同一结论下的完整结果组。已有评估排在前面；单项判断不替代整组结论。展开行查看条件、来源与历次证据。

每行是一项测量，分别显示论文报告、最近可用实测和累计证据状态。
指标与条件	论文报告	最近可用实测	证据判断
reportedPlusMinus: 0.2	87.9%	—	尚未评估
reportedPlusMinus: 144.5	1,205.1 seconds	—	尚未评估
reportedPlusMinus: 0.1	88.5%	—	尚未评估
reportedPlusMinus: 0.15	19.06 seconds	—	尚未评估
reportedPlusMinus: 0.2	97%	—	尚未评估
reportedPlusMinus: 9.9	129.6 seconds	—	尚未评估
reportedPlusMinus: 0.1	97.2%	—	尚未评估
reportedPlusMinus: 0.03	1.9 seconds	—	尚未评估
reportedPlusMinus: 0.2	93.8%	—	尚未评估
reportedPlusMinus: 13	245 seconds	—	尚未评估
reportedPlusMinus: 0.2	94%	—	尚未评估
reportedPlusMinus: 0.01	3.01 seconds	—	尚未评估

K=2 SGC matches or slightly exceeds TextGCN accuracy on 20NG, R8, R52, and Ohsumed while training much faster; on MR it is 0.4 percentage points lower, though still faster. The largest reported speedup is 83.6×.

报告指标与观测值

Assessment（0）

关联运行（0）

测量结果