Table 10 reports the full zero-shot evaluation row for Mamba-2-370M.

openai/gpt-5.6-luna-pro

55fb7cfab4

Canonical EleutherAI/pile validation input could not be loaded; no non-equivalent subset was substituted. · HellaSwag, PIQA, ARC-E, ARC-C, and OpenBookQA expose both acc and acc_norm, while the fixed sources do not identify the intended Table 10 field; both alternatives were retained. · The seven-task average is unresolved because it depends on those five metric-field choices. · Unresolved metric interpretation: m-t10-m2-370-hs: HellaSwag is evaluated as the Table 10 zero-shot multiple-choice task, but the paper labels the column only acc while the fixed lm-eval task definition declares both ordinary acc and length-normalized acc_norm. The paper and official repository do not identify which field produced the reported column, so both percentage-point alternatives are retained and no scalar claim value is selected.; m-t10-m2-370-piqa: PIQA is evaluated as zero-shot multiple choice on its validation split, but the paper labels the quantity simply acc while the fixed lm-eval task definition declares both ordinary acc and length-normalized acc_norm. The paper and official repository do not identify the intended field, so both percentage-point alternatives are retained and no scalar claim value is selected.; m-t10-m2-370-arce: ARC-E is the ARC-Easy zero-shot multiple-choice validation evaluation, but the paper labels the column only acc while the fixed lm-eval task definition declares both ordinary acc and length-normalized acc_norm. The paper and official repository do not identify the intended field, so both percentage-point alternatives are retained and no scalar claim value is selected.; m-t10-m2-370-arcc: ARC-C is the ARC-Challenge zero-shot multiple-choice validation evaluation, inheriting ordinary acc and length-normalized acc_norm from the ARC task definition. The paper labels the column only acc and the fixed sources do not identify which field was used, so both percentage-point alternatives are retained and no scalar claim value is selected.; m-t10-m2-370-openbook: OpenBookQA is evaluated zero-shot as multiple choice on the fixed harness split, but the paper labels the column only acc while the task definition declares both ordinary acc and length-normalized acc_norm. The paper and official repository do not identify the intended field, so both percentage-point alternatives are retained and no scalar claim value is selected.; m-t10-m2- · Unresolved measurements: m-t10-m2-370-pile: The preserved parser evidence did not contain a trustworthy metric: JSON 指针没有指向有限数值; m-t10-m2-370-hs: The preserved parser evidence did not contain a trustworthy metric: JSON 指针没有指向有限数值; m-t10-m2-370-piqa: The preserved parser evidence did not contain a trustworthy metric: JSON 指针没有指向有限数值; m-t10-m2-370-arce: The preserved parser evidence did not contain a trustworthy metric: JSON 指针没有指向有限数值; m-t10-m2-370-arcc: The preserved parser evidence did not contain a trustworthy metric: JSON 指针没有指向有限数值; m-t10-m2-370-openbook: The preserved parser evidence did not contain a trustworthy metric: JSON 指针没有指向有限数值; m-t10-m2-370-avg: The preserved parser evidence did not contain a trustworthy metric: JSON 指针没有指向有限数值 · Canonical Pile validation data was unavailable, so the full Table 10 row was not completed. · The current response assesses only the three supplied measurement IDs; other Table 10 measurements are not promoted from the retained wider catalog. · The supplied source locator identifies PDF page 52, while the retained paper excerpt containing Table 10 is labeled PDF page 55; this locator discrepancy does not alter the visible reported values but remains unresolved. · The exact historical dataset revisions and paper-side evaluator configuration are not independently verified. · The current execution provides comparable evidence for the three supplied measurements: LAMBADA perplexity, LAMBADA accuracy, and WinoGrande accuracy. Their observed values are close to the reported Table 10 values under the released Mamba-2-370M checkpoint and NeoX tokenizer. However, the broader claim concerns the full evaluation row, while Pile validation was not executed and the other row measurements were not supplied for assessment. Partial support therefore cannot establish the full-row claim. Some original claim measurements remain without evidence; available measurements are assessed individually.