Table 10 reports the full zero-shot evaluation row for Pythia-160M.

openai/gpt-5.6-luna-pro

198923f0d7

The exact EleutherAI/Pile validation artifact was unavailable at the verified loader URL (HTTP 404); no altered Pile mirror was substituted, so m-t10-p160-pile remains unresolved. · The evaluation ran on the allocated CPU device rather than the source paper's reference accelerator; this affects execution conditions, not the reported numerical task measurements. · The source Table 10 row values are comparison context only; they were not copied as execution evidence. · Unresolved measurements: m-t10-p160-pile: The preserved parser evidence did not contain a trustworthy metric: JSON 指针没有指向有限数值 · The complete source row includes a Pile validation perplexity measurement that was not executed because the exact validation artifact returned HTTP 404; no substitute mirror was used. · The retained paper excerpt labels the multiple-choice columns as acc but does not define their normalization semantics. · The underlying lm-eval task YAML/API excerpts cited by the plan are not included in the retained evidence context, so the plan's resolved plain-acc interpretation cannot by itself prove source comparability. · The raw evaluator output does not independently record the lm-eval package version, although the plan and execution summary identify lm-eval 0.4.2. · The run used CPU fallback and did not capture exact checkpoint-byte hashes; these are not expected to materially affect the reported accuracy values but limit exact condition verification. · The captured full-run command demonstrates fresh evaluation of the released Pythia-160M checkpoint on the seven downstream tasks and a recomputed average. LAMBADA perplexity, LAMBADA accuracy, and WinoGrande accuracy are approximately reproduced. However, the source-matching Pile validation perplexity was not measured, so the complete Table 10 row was not executed. In addition, for HellaSwag, PIQA, ARC-Easy, ARC-Challenge, and OpenBookQA, the raw output contains both plain acc and acc_norm while the retained paper excerpt does not establish which quantity the paper's displayed acc columns represent; the underlying task-definition excerpts needed to resolve that mapping are not retained. Therefore the full-row claim remains inconclusive. Some original claim measurements remain without evidence; available measurements are assessed individually.