The paper reports that removing memory actions, rollout rejection, or both lowers average F1, and that removing both retrieval and memory rewards gives the lowest ablation average.

The paper reports that removing memory actions, rollout rejection, or both lowers average F1, and that removing both retrieval and memory rewards gives the lowest ablation average. · CiteArk

Measurement results

0/2 assessed

0 supported0 disputed or conflicting2 not assessed

The complete result group stays with its claim. Assessed rows come first; their judgments do not replace the whole-claim conclusion. Expand a row for conditions, sources, and evidence history.

Each row is a measurement with its reported value, latest available observation, and cumulative evidence state.
Metric and conditions	Reported	Latest observation	Evidence judgment
condition: full model · aggregation: average across seven benchmarks · model_variant: Qwen2.5-3B	33.55 percentage_points	—	Not assessed
condition: without retrieval and memory rewards · aggregation: average across seven benchmarks · model_variant: Qwen2.5-3B	19.94 percentage_points	—	Not assessed

The paper reports that removing memory actions, rollout rejection, or both lowers average F1, and that removing both retrieval and memory rewards gives the lowest ablation average.

Reported and observed measurements

Assessments (0)

Runs (0)

Measurement results