Loading page…
ASPIRE-FSM could match or slightly outperform ASPIRE on individual workloads, but the full batch-aware scheduler was more consistent overall. ASPIRE improved on ASPIRE-FSM for both reasoning tasks on both 8B models, while Qwen3-1.7B LB-v2[30k-40k] was a printed counterexample (4.17× versus 4.18×). Overall means were 3.34×/2.08×/2.14× for ASPIRE versus 3.26×/1.94×/1.93× for ASPIRE-FSM. · CiteArk