The paper reports strong agreement between GPT-4.1-mini judging and human annotation, while noting a conservative error skew for fact-presence decisions.

The paper reports strong agreement between GPT-4.1-mini judging and human annotation, while noting a conservative error skew for fact-presence decisions. · CiteArk

Measurement results

0/5 assessed

0 supported0 disputed or conflicting5 not assessed

The complete result group stays with its claim. Assessed rows come first; their judgments do not replace the whole-claim conclusion. Expand a row for conditions, sources, and evidence history.

Each row is a measurement with its reported value, latest available observation, and cumulative evidence state.
Reported	Latest observation	Evidence judgment
92%	—	Not assessed
0.84 coefficient	—	Not assessed
200 examples	—	Not assessed
12 cases	—	Not assessed
16 cases	—	Not assessed

The paper reports strong agreement between GPT-4.1-mini judging and human annotation, while noting a conservative error skew for fact-presence decisions.

Reported and observed measurements

Assessments (0)

Runs (0)

Measurement results