Gold-paragraph consistency analysis shows that the fact-presence judge usually labels a hop answerable when its gold paragraph is retrieved, but also finds both retrieved gold paragraphs that are not self-sufficient and non-gold passages that contain the needed fact.

Gold-paragraph consistency analysis shows that the fact-presence judge usually labels a hop answerable when its gold paragraph is retrieved, but also finds both retrieved gold paragraphs that are not self-sufficient and non-gold passages that contain the needed fact. · CiteArk

Measurement results

0/5 assessed

0 supported0 disputed or conflicting5 not assessed

The complete result group stays with its claim. Assessed rows come first; their judgments do not replace the whole-claim conclusion. Expand a row for conditions, sources, and evidence history.

Each row is a measurement with its reported value, latest available observation, and cumulative evidence state.
Reported	Latest observation	Evidence judgment
81.7%	—	Not assessed
2,677 hops	—	Not assessed
18.3%	—	Not assessed
15%	—	Not assessed
468 hops	—	Not assessed

Gold-paragraph consistency analysis shows that the fact-presence judge usually labels a hop answerable when its gold paragraph is retrieved, but also finds both retrieved gold paragraphs that are not self-sufficient and non-gold passages that contain the needed fact.

Reported and observed measurements

Assessments (0)

Runs (0)

Measurement results