DeBERTa fact-presence flags and low-BM25-score flags are only partly overlapping and jointly provide the strongest reported question-level association with QA failure, supporting the paper's interpretation that they capture complementary failure dimensions.

DeBERTa fact-presence flags and low-BM25-score flags are only partly overlapping and jointly provide the strongest reported question-level association with QA failure, supporting the paper's interpretation that they capture complementary failure dimensions. · CiteArk

Measurement results

0/26 assessed

0 supported0 disputed or conflicting26 not assessed

The complete result group stays with its claim. Assessed rows come first; their judgments do not replace the whole-claim conclusion. Expand a row for conditions, sources, and evidence history.

Each row is a measurement with its reported value, latest available observation, and cumulative evidence state.
Metric and conditions	Reported	Latest observation	Evidence judgment
predictor: Random	-0.066 coefficient	—	Not assessed
predictor: Random	0.0011 probability	—	Not assessed
predictor: DeBERTa	-0.216 coefficient	—	Not assessed
predictor: DeBERTa	0 probability	—	Not assessed
predictor: BM25 threshold	-0.254 coefficient	—	Not assessed
predictor: BM25 threshold	0 probability	—	Not assessed
predictor: DeBERTa intersection BM25 threshold	-0.282 coefficient	—	Not assessed
predictor: DeBERTa intersection BM25 threshold	0 probability	—	Not assessed
	42.9%	—	Not assessed
flagCategory: Both flag	1,971 hops	—	Not assessed
flagCategory: Both flag	30.8%	—	Not assessed
flagCategory: DeBERTa only	1,230 hops	—	Not assessed

DeBERTa fact-presence flags and low-BM25-score flags are only partly overlapping and jointly provide the strongest reported question-level association with QA failure, supporting the paper's interpretation that they capture complementary failure dimensions.

Reported and observed measurements

Assessments (0)

Runs (0)

Measurement results