The adjudicated rejected-candidate audit confirms 96 of 100 rejections; four rejected candidates are judged valid. Evidence-grounding failure and ambiguity/non-uniqueness are the largest rejection categories. The 4.0% is the valid share of the sampled rejected pool, not the false-rejection rate over all valid candidates.

The adjudicated rejected-candidate audit confirms 96 of 100 rejections; four rejected candidates are judged valid. Evidence-grounding failure and ambiguity/non-uniqueness are the largest rejection categories. The 4.0% is the valid share of the sampled rejected pool, not the false-rejection rate over all valid candidates. · CiteArk

Measurement results

0/20 assessed

0 supported0 disputed or conflicting20 not assessed

The complete result group stays with its claim. Assessed rows come first; their judgments do not replace the whole-claim conclusion. Expand a row for conditions, sources, and evidence history.

Each row is a measurement with its reported value, latest available observation, and cumulative evidence state.
Metric and conditions	Reported	Latest observation	Evidence judgment
outcome: Evidence-grounding failure	33 candidates	—	Not assessed
outcome: Evidence-grounding failure	33%	—	Not assessed
outcome: Ambiguity/non-uniqueness	22 candidates	—	Not assessed
outcome: Ambiguity/non-uniqueness	22%	—	Not assessed
outcome: Query leakage or construction issue	16 candidates	—	Not assessed
outcome: Query leakage or construction issue	16%	—	Not assessed
outcome: Task-consistency failure	14 candidates	—	Not assessed
outcome: Task-consistency failure	14%	—	Not assessed
outcome: Coverage/completeness failure	11 candidates	—	Not assessed
outcome: Coverage/completeness failure	11%	—	Not assessed
outcome: Correctly rejected (subtotal)	96 candidates	—	Not assessed
outcome: Correctly rejected (subtotal)	96%	—	Not assessed

Reported and observed measurements

Assessments (0)

Runs (0)

Measurement results