Under K=4 rollouts on Qwen3-0.6B-Base, continuous online success-rate weighting in OSW-FT (24.00% MATH-500, 20.71% GPQA-Diamond) outperforms hard-thresholded binary rejection weighting (23.80% MATH-500, 15.15% GPQA-Diamond) and mean-matched random weighting (21.40% MATH-500, 15.17% GPQA-Diamond).

Under K=4 rollouts on Qwen3-0.6B-Base, continuous online success-rate weighting in OSW-FT (24.00% MATH-500, 20.71% GPQA-Diamond) outperforms hard-thresholded binary rejection weighting (23.80% MATH-500, 15.15% GPQA-Diamond) and mean-matched random weighting (21.40% MATH-500, 15.17% GPQA-Diamond). · CiteArk

Measurement results

0/6 assessed

0 supported0 disputed or conflicting6 not assessed

The complete result group stays with its claim. Assessed rows come first; their judgments do not replace the whole-claim conclusion. Expand a row for conditions, sources, and evidence history.

Each row is a measurement with its reported value, latest available observation, and cumulative evidence state.
Reported	Latest observation	Evidence judgment
23.8 percentage_points	—	Not assessed
15.15 percentage_points	—	Not assessed
21.4 percentage_points	—	Not assessed
15.17 percentage_points	—	Not assessed
24 percentage_points	—	Not assessed
20.71 percentage_points	—	Not assessed

Under K=4 rollouts on Qwen3-0.6B-Base, continuous online success-rate weighting in OSW-FT (24.00% MATH-500, 20.71% GPQA-Diamond) outperforms hard-thresholded binary rejection weighting (23.80% MATH-500, 15.15% GPQA-Diamond) and mean-matched random weighting (21.40% MATH-500, 15.17% GPQA-Diamond).

Reported and observed measurements

Assessments (0)

Runs (0)

Measurement results