Across the same 40 papers, PaperDoctor generally produced more atomic findings per reviewer and paper than published referee reports or the Stanford Agentic Reviewer, with larger within-domain spread.

Across the same 40 papers, PaperDoctor generally produced more atomic findings per reviewer and paper than published referee reports or the Stanford Agentic Reviewer, with larger within-domain spread. · CiteArk

Measurement results

0/16 assessed

0 supported0 disputed or conflicting16 not assessed

The complete result group stays with its claim. Assessed rows come first; their judgments do not replace the whole-claim conclusion. Expand a row for conditions, sources, and evidence history.

Each row is a measurement with its reported value, latest available observation, and cumulative evidence state.
Metric and conditions	Reported	Latest observation	Evidence judgment
source: Referee reports · paper group: Agents4Science	6.9 findings/reviewer/paper	—	Not assessed
source: Stanford Agentic Reviewer · paper group: Agents4Science	44 findings/reviewer/paper	—	Not assessed
source: PaperDoctor · paper group: Agents4Science	56.4 findings/reviewer/paper	—	Not assessed
source: Referee reports · paper group: ICML	6.7 findings/reviewer/paper	—	Not assessed
source: Stanford Agentic Reviewer · paper group: ICML	25.2 findings/reviewer/paper	—	Not assessed
source: PaperDoctor · paper group: ICML	47.9 findings/reviewer/paper	—	Not assessed
source: Referee reports · paper group: NatureScience	16.2 findings/reviewer/paper	—	Not assessed
source: Stanford Agentic Reviewer · paper group: NatureScience	37 findings/reviewer/paper	—	Not assessed
source: PaperDoctor · paper group: NatureScience	47.7 findings/reviewer/paper	—	Not assessed
source: Referee reports · paper group: SocialScience	17.5 findings/reviewer/paper	—	Not assessed
source: Stanford Agentic Reviewer · paper group: SocialScience	36.2 findings/reviewer/paper	—	Not assessed
source: PaperDoctor · paper group: SocialScience	36.1 findings/reviewer/paper	—	Not assessed

Across the same 40 papers, PaperDoctor generally produced more atomic findings per reviewer and paper than published referee reports or the Stanford Agentic Reviewer, with larger within-domain spread.

Reported and observed measurements

Assessments (0)

Runs (0)

Measurement results