PaperDoctor attached both evidence and a suggestion to every finding by construction; referees did so for 35.9% of findings and the Stanford Agentic Reviewer for 1.5%, whose dominant pattern was suggestion without evidence.

PaperDoctor attached both evidence and a suggestion to every finding by construction; referees did so for 35.9% of findings and the Stanford Agentic Reviewer for 1.5%, whose dominant pattern was suggestion without evidence. · CiteArk

Measurement results

0/16 assessed

0 supported0 disputed or conflicting16 not assessed

The complete result group stays with its claim. Assessed rows come first; their judgments do not replace the whole-claim conclusion. Expand a row for conditions, sources, and evidence history.

Each row is a measurement with its reported value, latest available observation, and cumulative evidence state.
Metric and conditions	Reported	Latest observation	Evidence judgment
source: Referee reports · pattern: Evidence + Suggestion	35.9 % of findings	—	Not assessed
source: Referee reports · pattern: Evidence only	9.3 % of findings	—	Not assessed
source: Referee reports · pattern: Suggestion only	35.8 % of findings	—	Not assessed
source: Referee reports · pattern: Neither	19 % of findings	—	Not assessed
source: Stanford Agentic Reviewer · pattern: Evidence + Suggestion	1.5 % of findings	—	Not assessed
source: Stanford Agentic Reviewer · pattern: Evidence only	0.7 % of findings	—	Not assessed
source: Stanford Agentic Reviewer · pattern: Suggestion only	69.9 % of findings	—	Not assessed
source: Stanford Agentic Reviewer · pattern: Neither	27.8 % of findings	—	Not assessed
source: PaperDoctor · pattern: Evidence + Suggestion	100 % of findings	—	Not assessed
source: PaperDoctor · pattern: Evidence only	0 % of findings	—	Not assessed
source: PaperDoctor · pattern: Suggestion only	0 % of findings	—	Not assessed
source: PaperDoctor · pattern: Neither	0 % of findings	—	Not assessed

PaperDoctor attached both evidence and a suggestion to every finding by construction; referees did so for 35.9% of findings and the Stanford Agentic Reviewer for 1.5%, whose dominant pattern was suggestion without evidence.

Reported and observed measurements

Assessments (0)

Runs (0)

Measurement results