PaperDoctor distributed its feedback more evenly across manuscript, literature, and code dimensions than referees or the Stanford Agentic Reviewer, both of which concentrated on experiments in the main body.

PaperDoctor distributed its feedback more evenly across manuscript, literature, and code dimensions than referees or the Stanford Agentic Reviewer, both of which concentrated on experiments in the main body. · CiteArk

Measurement results

0/22 assessed

0 supported0 disputed or conflicting22 not assessed

The complete result group stays with its claim. Assessed rows come first; their judgments do not replace the whole-claim conclusion. Expand a row for conditions, sources, and evidence history.

Each row is a measurement with its reported value, latest available observation, and cumulative evidence state.
Metric and conditions	Reported	Latest observation	Evidence judgment
topic: Main body: experiments · source: Referee reports	49.5 % of findings	—	Not assessed
topic: Main body: methodology · source: Referee reports	13.1 % of findings	—	Not assessed
topic: Main body: writing · source: Referee reports	16.7 % of findings	—	Not assessed
topic: Main body: figures · source: Referee reports	10.8 % of findings	—	Not assessed
topic: External: literature · source: Referee reports	7 % of findings	—	Not assessed
topic: External: code · source: Referee reports	3 % of findings	—	Not assessed
topic: Main body: experiments · source: Stanford Agentic Reviewer	72.6 % of findings	—	Not assessed
topic: Main body: methodology · source: Stanford Agentic Reviewer	12.8 % of findings	—	Not assessed
topic: Main body: writing · source: Stanford Agentic Reviewer	1.7 % of findings	—	Not assessed
topic: Main body: figures · source: Stanford Agentic Reviewer	2.4 % of findings	—	Not assessed
topic: External: literature · source: Stanford Agentic Reviewer	7.6 % of findings	—	Not assessed
topic: External: code · source: Stanford Agentic Reviewer	2.9 % of findings	—	Not assessed

PaperDoctor distributed its feedback more evenly across manuscript, literature, and code dimensions than referees or the Stanford Agentic Reviewer, both of which concentrated on experiments in the main body.

Reported and observed measurements

Assessments (0)

Runs (0)

Measurement results