PaperDoctor's L1 check frequencies were broadly similar across paper groups, while L2 Code findings were highest for AI-written papers, Theory findings were highest for ICML, and Experiment Design findings separated the groups most strongly.

PaperDoctor's L1 check frequencies were broadly similar across paper groups, while L2 Code findings were highest for AI-written papers, Theory findings were highest for ICML, and Experiment Design findings separated the groups most strongly. · CiteArk

Measurement results

0/28 assessed

0 supported0 disputed or conflicting28 not assessed

The complete result group stays with its claim. Assessed rows come first; their judgments do not replace the whole-claim conclusion. Expand a row for conditions, sources, and evidence history.

Each row is a measurement with its reported value, latest available observation, and cumulative evidence state.
Metric and conditions	Reported	Latest observation	Evidence judgment
check: Writing · paper group: Agents4Science	14.6 findings/paper	—	Not assessed
check: Writing · paper group: ICML	15.4 findings/paper	—	Not assessed
check: Writing · paper group: NatureScience	14.7 findings/paper	—	Not assessed
check: Writing · paper group: SocialScience	12.6 findings/paper	—	Not assessed
check: Figure · paper group: Agents4Science	7 findings/paper	—	Not assessed
check: Figure · paper group: ICML	6.1 findings/paper	—	Not assessed
check: Figure · paper group: NatureScience	5.6 findings/paper	—	Not assessed
check: Figure · paper group: SocialScience	5 findings/paper	—	Not assessed
check: Citation · paper group: Agents4Science	4 findings/paper	—	Not assessed
check: Citation · paper group: ICML	5.3 findings/paper	—	Not assessed
check: Citation · paper group: NatureScience	3.8 findings/paper	—	Not assessed
check: Citation · paper group: SocialScience	2.8 findings/paper	—	Not assessed

PaperDoctor's L1 check frequencies were broadly similar across paper groups, while L2 Code findings were highest for AI-written papers, Theory findings were highest for ICML, and Experiment Design findings separated the groups most strongly.

Reported and observed measurements

Assessments (0)

Runs (0)

Measurement results