For a Nature Communications microscopy paper, rebuilding the shipped Figure 2d analysis yielded soft-focal contact-task recalls of 0.43 and 0.49, corresponding to a 1.14x best-pair ratio and 1.04x mean ratio rather than the prose claim of almost 2x.

For a Nature Communications microscopy paper, rebuilding the shipped Figure 2d analysis yielded soft-focal contact-task recalls of 0.43 and 0.49, corresponding to a 1.14x best-pair ratio and 1.04x mean ratio rather than the prose claim of almost 2x. · CiteArk

Measurement results

0/6 assessed

0 supported0 disputed or conflicting6 not assessed

The complete result group stays with its claim. Assessed rows come first; their judgments do not replace the whole-claim conclusion. Expand a row for conditions, sources, and evidence history.

Each row is a measurement with its reported value, latest available observation, and cumulative evidence state.
Metric and conditions	Reported	Latest observation	Evidence judgment
	2 x	—	Not assessed
configuration: soft-focal configuration 1	0.43 recall score	—	Not assessed
configuration: soft-focal configuration 2	0.49 recall score	—	Not assessed
	1.14 x	—	Not assessed
	1.04 x	—	Not assessed
	14%	—	Not assessed

For a Nature Communications microscopy paper, rebuilding the shipped Figure 2d analysis yielded soft-focal contact-task recalls of 0.43 and 0.49, corresponding to a 1.14x best-pair ratio and 1.04x mean ratio rather than the prose claim of almost 2x.

Reported and observed measurements

Assessments (0)

Runs (0)

Measurement results