Among plans that ran, high-priority plans passed more often and errored less often than medium- or low-priority plans; medium-priority pass rates were close to low-priority rates rather than intermediate.

Among plans that ran, high-priority plans passed more often and errored less often than medium- or low-priority plans; medium-priority pass rates were close to low-priority rates rather than intermediate. · CiteArk

Measurement results

0/12 assessed

0 supported0 disputed or conflicting12 not assessed

The complete result group stays with its claim. Assessed rows come first; their judgments do not replace the whole-claim conclusion. Expand a row for conditions, sources, and evidence history.

Each row is a measurement with its reported value, latest available observation, and cumulative evidence state.
Metric and conditions	Reported	Latest observation	Evidence judgment
outcome: Pass · priority: High	47.3%	—	Not assessed
outcome: Warning · priority: High	23.6%	—	Not assessed
outcome: Error · priority: High	29.1%	—	Not assessed
priority: High	110 plans	—	Not assessed
outcome: Pass · priority: Medium	33.3%	—	Not assessed
outcome: Warning · priority: Medium	32.1%	—	Not assessed
outcome: Error · priority: Medium	34.6%	—	Not assessed
priority: Medium	81 plans	—	Not assessed
outcome: Pass · priority: Low	33.6%	—	Not assessed
outcome: Warning · priority: Low	26.7%	—	Not assessed
outcome: Error · priority: Low	39.7%	—	Not assessed
priority: Low	116 plans	—	Not assessed

Among plans that ran, high-priority plans passed more often and errored less often than medium- or low-priority plans; medium-priority pass rates were close to low-priority rates rather than intermediate.

Reported and observed measurements

Assessments (0)

Runs (0)

Measurement results