Performance comparison of Procedural Graph against 7 baselines (Vanilla ReAct, MemoryBank, RAP, ExpeL, AutoGuide, AWM, KnowAgent) on GDPval (economically valuable professional deliverables (44 test items, mean rubric score)) using Gemini 3.5 Flash. Procedural Graph achieves 64.42points compared to the best baseline score of 62.45points (margin of +1.97points).

Performance comparison of Procedural Graph against 7 baselines (Vanilla ReAct, MemoryBank, RAP, ExpeL, AutoGuide, AWM, KnowAgent) on GDPval (economically valuable professional deliverables (44 test items, mean rubric score)) using Gemini 3.5 Flash. Procedural Graph achieves 64.42points compared to the best baseline score of 62.45points (margin of +1.97points). · CiteArk

Measurement results

0/8 assessed

0 supported0 disputed or conflicting8 not assessed

The complete result group stays with its claim. Assessed rows come first; their judgments do not replace the whole-claim conclusion. Expand a row for conditions, sources, and evidence history.

Each row is a measurement with its reported value, latest available observation, and cumulative evidence state.
Metric and conditions	Reported	Latest observation	Evidence judgment
model: Gemini 3.5 Flash · method: Vanilla ReAct (Yao et al., 2023b) · benchmark: GDPval	59.33 points	—	Not assessed
model: Gemini 3.5 Flash · method: MemoryBank (Zhong et al., 2024) · benchmark: GDPval	59.27 points	—	Not assessed
model: Gemini 3.5 Flash · method: RAP (Kagaya et al., 2024) · benchmark: GDPval	60.23 points	—	Not assessed
model: Gemini 3.5 Flash · method: ExpeL (Zhao et al., 2024) · benchmark: GDPval	62.45 points	—	Not assessed
model: Gemini 3.5 Flash · method: AutoGuide (Fu et al., 2024) · benchmark: GDPval	50.29 points	—	Not assessed
model: Gemini 3.5 Flash · method: AWM (Wang et al., 2025b) · benchmark: GDPval	50.25 points	—	Not assessed
model: Gemini 3.5 Flash · method: KnowAgent (Zhu et al., 2025) · benchmark: GDPval	54 points	—	Not assessed
model: Gemini 3.5 Flash · method: Procedural Graph (Ours) · benchmark: GDPval	64.42 points	—	Not assessed

Reported and observed measurements

Assessments (0)

Runs (0)

Measurement results