Across 24 model-benchmark evaluation settings (4 LLM families x 6 benchmarks), Procedural Graph ranks first or joint first in 21 of 24 settings. Compared against the strongest baseline in each setting, PG records 19 wins, 2 ties, and 3 losses (one-sided exact binomial sign test excluding ties, p = 4.3e-4).

Across 24 model-benchmark evaluation settings (4 LLM families x 6 benchmarks), Procedural Graph ranks first or joint first in 21 of 24 settings. Compared against the strongest baseline in each setting, PG records 19 wins, 2 ties, and 3 losses (one-sided exact binomial sign test excluding ties, p = 4.3e-4). · CiteArk

Measurement results

0/5 assessed

0 supported0 disputed or conflicting5 not assessed

The complete result group stays with its claim. Assessed rows come first; their judgments do not replace the whole-claim conclusion. Expand a row for conditions, sources, and evidence history.

Each row is a measurement with its reported value, latest available observation, and cumulative evidence state.
Metric and conditions	Reported	Latest observation	Evidence judgment
totalSettings: 24	21 settings	—	Not assessed
	19 settings	—	Not assessed
	2 settings	—	Not assessed
	3 settings	—	Not assessed
	0.0004 probability	—	Not assessed

Reported and observed measurements

Assessments (0)

Runs (0)

Measurement results