The three clarification benchmarks differ substantially in size and ambiguity prevalence: PACIFIC is table-grounded financial QA, AbgCoQA is passage-grounded conversational QA, and AmbigNQ is ambiguity-heavy open-domain QA.

The three clarification benchmarks differ substantially in size and ambiguity prevalence: PACIFIC is table-grounded financial QA, AbgCoQA is passage-grounded conversational QA, and AmbigNQ is ambiguity-heavy open-domain QA. · CiteArk

Measurement results

0/11 assessed

0 supported0 disputed or conflicting11 not assessed

The complete result group stays with its claim. Assessed rows come first; their judgments do not replace the whole-claim conclusion. Expand a row for conditions, sources, and evidence history.

Each row is a measurement with its reported value, latest available observation, and cumulative evidence state.
Metric and conditions	Reported	Latest observation	Evidence judgment
split: train · dataset: PACIFIC	15,087 examples	—	Not assessed
split: fullval · dataset: PACIFIC	1,952 examples	—	Not assessed
dataset: PACIFIC	16%	—	Not assessed
split: fullval · dataset: PACIFIC	316 examples	—	Not assessed
split: fullval · dataset: PACIFIC	1,636 examples	—	Not assessed
split: train · dataset: AbgCoQA	7,269 examples	—	Not assessed
split: fullval · dataset: AbgCoQA	1,184 examples	—	Not assessed
dataset: AbgCoQA	22%	—	Not assessed
split: train · dataset: AmbigNQ	19,244 examples	—	Not assessed
split: test · dataset: AmbigNQ	4,377 examples	—	Not assessed
dataset: AmbigNQ	79%	—	Not assessed

The three clarification benchmarks differ substantially in size and ambiguity prevalence: PACIFIC is table-grounded financial QA, AbgCoQA is passage-grounded conversational QA, and AmbigNQ is ambiguity-heavy open-domain QA.

Reported and observed measurements

Assessments (0)

Runs (0)

Measurement results