Sensitivity to the ambiguity-bonus weight is non-monotonic on PACIFIC: among rho values 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5, rho=0.3 has the highest overall F1, ambiguous-query clarification rate, and reported selectivity. Raising rho to 0.5 reduces F1 and recall and does not improve selectivity over the main setting.

Sensitivity to the ambiguity-bonus weight is non-monotonic on PACIFIC: among rho values 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5, rho=0.3 has the highest overall F1, ambiguous-query clarification rate, and reported selectivity. Raising rho to 0.5 reduces F1 and recall and does not improve selectivity over the main setting. · CiteArk

Measurement results

0/12 assessed

0 supported0 disputed or conflicting12 not assessed

The complete result group stays with its claim. Assessed rows come first; their judgments do not replace the whole-claim conclusion. Expand a row for conditions, sources, and evidence history.

Each row is a measurement with its reported value, latest available observation, and cumulative evidence state.
Metric and conditions	Reported	Latest observation	Evidence judgment
rho: 0.1	0.702 score (0-1)	—	Not assessed
rho: 0.1	0.681 proportion	—	Not assessed
rho: 0.1	0.175 proportion	—	Not assessed
rho: 0.1	0.506 proportion-point difference	—	Not assessed
rho: 0.3	0.795 score (0-1)	—	Not assessed
rho: 0.3	0.873 proportion	—	Not assessed
rho: 0.3	0.26 proportion	—	Not assessed
rho: 0.3	0.613 proportion-point difference	—	Not assessed
rho: 0.5	0.703 score (0-1)	—	Not assessed
rho: 0.5	0.789 proportion	—	Not assessed
rho: 0.5	0.188 proportion	—	Not assessed
rho: 0.5	0.601 proportion-point difference	—	Not assessed

Reported and observed measurements

Assessments (0)

Runs (0)

Measurement results