In a manual audit of eight ambiguous PACIFIC cases, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct returned an intent-consistent response in every case, whereas Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct did so in only one case; all three examples printed in Table 11 show the 7B reply matching the latent intent and the 3B reply contradicting it.

In a manual audit of eight ambiguous PACIFIC cases, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct returned an intent-consistent response in every case, whereas Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct did so in only one case; all three examples printed in Table 11 show the 7B reply matching the latent intent and the 3B reply contradicting it. · CiteArk

Measurement results

0/2 assessed

0 supported0 disputed or conflicting2 not assessed

The complete result group stays with its claim. Assessed rows come first; their judgments do not replace the whole-claim conclusion. Expand a row for conditions, sources, and evidence history.

Each row is a measurement with its reported value, latest available observation, and cumulative evidence state.
Metric and conditions	Reported	Latest observation	Evidence judgment
simulator: Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct · auditedCases: 8	8 cases	—	Not assessed
simulator: Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct · auditedCases: 8	1 cases	—	Not assessed

In a manual audit of eight ambiguous PACIFIC cases, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct returned an intent-consistent response in every case, whereas Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct did so in only one case; all three examples printed in Table 11 show the 7B reply matching the latent intent and the 3B reply contradicting it.

Reported and observed measurements

Assessments (0)

Runs (0)

Measurement results