For CIGAsk 7B, both the mean CIG on clarification turns and the batch-weighted CIG rise over training; the paper reports that this rise coincides with the emergence of the ambiguous-recall versus clear-query false-positive-rate gap.

For CIGAsk 7B, both the mean CIG on clarification turns and the batch-weighted CIG rise over training; the paper reports that this rise coincides with the emergence of the ambiguous-recall versus clear-query false-positive-rate gap. · CiteArk

Measurement results

0/4 assessed

0 supported0 disputed or conflicting4 not assessed

The complete result group stays with its claim. Assessed rows come first; their judgments do not replace the whole-claim conclusion. Expand a row for conditions, sources, and evidence history.

Each row is a measurement with its reported value, latest available observation, and cumulative evidence state.
Metric and conditions	Reported	Latest observation	Evidence judgment
series: IG on clarify turns · trainingStep: 5	0.17 CIG signal (nats)	—	Not assessed
series: IG on clarify turns · trainingStep: 250	0.47 CIG signal (nats)	—	Not assessed
series: IG batch-weighted · trainingStep: 5	0.02 CIG signal (nats)	—	Not assessed
series: IG batch-weighted · trainingStep: 250	0.23 CIG signal (nats)	—	Not assessed

For CIGAsk 7B, both the mean CIG on clarification turns and the batch-weighted CIG rise over training; the paper reports that this rise coincides with the emergence of the ambiguous-recall versus clear-query false-positive-rate gap.

Reported and observed measurements

Assessments (0)

Runs (0)

Measurement results