Although destructiveHint was serialized on 65.8% of tools, only 12.9% of all tools carried an applicable destructive classification and only 3.1% asserted that the operation was destructive.

Although destructiveHint was serialized on 65.8% of tools, only 12.9% of all tools carried an applicable destructive classification and only 3.1% asserted that the operation was destructive. · CiteArk

Measurement results

0/3 assessed

0 supported0 disputed or conflicting3 not assessed

The complete result group stays with its claim. Assessed rows come first; their judgments do not replace the whole-claim conclusion. Expand a row for conditions, sources, and evidence history.

Each row is a measurement with its reported value, latest available observation, and cumulative evidence state.
Reported	Latest observation	Evidence judgment
65.8 % of tools	—	Not assessed
12.9 % of tools	—	Not assessed
3.1 % of tools	—	Not assessed

Although destructiveHint was serialized on 65.8% of tools, only 12.9% of all tools carried an applicable destructive classification and only 3.1% asserted that the operation was destructive.

Reported and observed measurements

Assessments (0)

Runs (0)

Measurement results