Tool-level signatures over true, false, or omitted values for the four annotation fields were highly concentrated: 66 of 81 possible signatures occurred, the leading signature covered 39.9% of tools, no annotations was second at 26.0%, and the top three covered 75.8%.

Tool-level signatures over true, false, or omitted values for the four annotation fields were highly concentrated: 66 of 81 possible signatures occurred, the leading signature covered 39.9% of tools, no annotations was second at 26.0%, and the top three covered 75.8%. · CiteArk

Measurement results

0/5 assessed

0 supported0 disputed or conflicting5 not assessed

The complete result group stays with its claim. Assessed rows come first; their judgments do not replace the whole-claim conclusion. Expand a row for conditions, sources, and evidence history.

Each row is a measurement with its reported value, latest available observation, and cumulative evidence state.
Reported	Latest observation	Evidence judgment
66 signatures	—	Not assessed
81 signatures	—	Not assessed
39.9 % of tools	—	Not assessed
26 % of tools	—	Not assessed
75.8 % of tools	—	Not assessed

Tool-level signatures over true, false, or omitted values for the four annotation fields were highly concentrated: 66 of 81 possible signatures occurred, the leading signature covered 39.9% of tools, no annotations was second at 26.0%, and the top three covered 75.8%.

Reported and observed measurements

Assessments (0)

Runs (0)

Measurement results