The ILSVRC 2015 localization ensemble reports 8.9% top-5 localization error on ImageNet validation and 9.0% on test, substantially below the OverFeat, GoogLeNet, and VGG comparison values. The paper reports a 64% relative error reduction and first place in the ILSVRC 2015 localization task.

The ILSVRC 2015 localization ensemble reports 8.9% top-5 localization error on ImageNet validation and 9.0% on test, substantially below the OverFeat, GoogLeNet, and VGG comparison values. The paper reports a 64% relative error reduction and first place in the ILSVRC 2015 localization task. · CiteArk

Measurement results

0/8 assessed

0 supported0 disputed or conflicting8 not assessed

The complete result group stays with its claim. Assessed rows come first; their judgments do not replace the whole-claim conclusion. Expand a row for conditions, sources, and evidence history.

Each row is a measurement with its reported value, latest available observation, and cumulative evidence state.
Reported	Latest observation	Evidence judgment
30%	—	Not assessed
29.9%	—	Not assessed
26.7%	—	Not assessed
26.9%	—	Not assessed
25.3%	—	Not assessed
8.9%	—	Not assessed
9%	—	Not assessed
64%	—	Not assessed

The ILSVRC 2015 localization ensemble reports 8.9% top-5 localization error on ImageNet validation and 9.0% on test, substantially below the OverFeat, GoogLeNet, and VGG comparison values. The paper reports a 64% relative error reduction and first place in the ILSVRC 2015 localization task.

Reported and observed measurements

Assessments (0)

Runs (0)

Measurement results