In the Forest Cover random-binning experiment, test accuracy continued to improve as more training data were used, and doubling the training-set size reduced test error by as much as 40%.

In the Forest Cover random-binning experiment, test accuracy continued to improve as more training data were used, and doubling the training-set size reduced test error by as much as 40%. · CiteArk

Measurement results

0/1 assessed

0 supported0 disputed or conflicting1 not assessed

The complete result group stays with its claim. Assessed rows come first; their judgments do not replace the whole-claim conclusion. Expand a row for conditions, sources, and evidence history.

Each row is a measurement with its reported value, latest available observation, and cumulative evidence state.
Metric and conditions	Reported	Latest observation	Evidence judgment
	40%	—	Not assessed

In the Forest Cover random-binning experiment, test accuracy continued to improve as more training data were used, and doubling the training-set size reduced test error by as much as 40%.

Reported and observed measurements

Assessments (0)

Runs (0)

Measurement results