Even with the original KDDCUP99 training order, the paper reports that changing the CVM regularization parameter by 15% produced a 49% test error, indicating strong sensitivity of this comparison to the parameter setting.

Even with the original KDDCUP99 training order, the paper reports that changing the CVM regularization parameter by 15% produced a 49% test error, indicating strong sensitivity of this comparison to the parameter setting. · CiteArk

Measurement results

0/2 assessed

0 supported0 disputed or conflicting2 not assessed

The complete result group stays with its claim. Assessed rows come first; their judgments do not replace the whole-claim conclusion. Expand a row for conditions, sources, and evidence history.

Each row is a measurement with its reported value, latest available observation, and cumulative evidence state.
Metric and conditions	Reported	Latest observation	Evidence judgment
	15%	—	Not assessed
	49%	—	Not assessed

Even with the original KDDCUP99 training order, the paper reports that changing the CVM regularization parameter by 15% produced a 49% test error, indicating strong sensitivity of this comparison to the parameter setting.

Reported and observed measurements

Assessments (0)

Runs (0)

Measurement results