Under Rahimi et al.'s framework, SGC reports higher within-161-mile accuracy and lower training time than GCN+H on GEOTEXT, TWITTER-US, and TWITTER-WORLD, saving more than 30 hours on TWITTER-WORLD.

Under Rahimi et al.'s framework, SGC reports higher within-161-mile accuracy and lower training time than GCN+H on GEOTEXT, TWITTER-US, and TWITTER-WORLD, saving more than 30 hours on TWITTER-WORLD. · CiteArk

Measurement results

0/12 assessed

0 supported0 disputed or conflicting12 not assessed

The complete result group stays with its claim. Assessed rows come first; their judgments do not replace the whole-claim conclusion. Expand a row for conditions, sources, and evidence history.

Each row is a measurement with its reported value, latest available observation, and cumulative evidence state.
Metric and conditions	Reported	Latest observation	Evidence judgment
reportedPlusMinus: 0.2	60.6%	—	Not assessed
	153 seconds	—	Not assessed
reportedPlusMinus: 0.1	61.1%	—	Not assessed
	5.6 seconds	—	Not assessed
reportedPlusMinus: 0.2	61.9%	—	Not assessed
printed: 9h 54m · additionalMinutes: 54	594 minutes	—	Not assessed
reportedPlusMinus: 0.1	62.5%	—	Not assessed
printed: 4h 33m · additionalMinutes: 33	273 minutes	—	Not assessed
reportedPlusMinus: 0.2	53.6%	—	Not assessed
printed: 2d 05h 17m · additionalHours: 5 · additionalMinutes: 17	3,197 minutes	—	Not assessed
reportedPlusMinus: 0.2	54.1%	—	Not assessed
printed: 22h 53m · additionalMinutes: 53	1,373 minutes	—	Not assessed

Under Rahimi et al.'s framework, SGC reports higher within-161-mile accuracy and lower training time than GCN+H on GEOTEXT, TWITTER-US, and TWITTER-WORLD, saving more than 30 hours on TWITTER-WORLD.

Reported and observed measurements

Assessments (0)

Runs (0)

Measurement results